Here’s a concise update on the latest news about glyphosate-based herbicides as of today.
-
Regulatory and safety reviews continue to be reassessed in light of new findings and litigation. Some recent coverage highlights that a long-standing safety review is under renewed scrutiny and pressure from health and environmental groups, with calls for EPA/other regulators to revisit risk assessments. This is part of a broader pattern where older studies are being revisited in light of newly publicized data and court disclosures. [sources cited in coverage broadly]
-
A notable development in 2025–2026 involves a high-profile retraction of a traditional glyphosate safety study and ongoing litigation; media outlets are reporting that governments and agencies are facing renewed demands to reevaluate glyphosate’s risk profile, including potential cancer links. The implications include possible regulatory pauses or stricter labeling and usage restrictions in some jurisdictions. [news coverage and statements from advocacy groups]
-
Regional reporting indicates continued use of glyphosate in agriculture and forestry, with regulators in several countries maintaining current approvals while monitoring emerging research and international opinions. Advocates for tighter controls emphasize precautionary approaches and increased transparency in data used for safety determinations. [public health and policy commentary]
-
Public discourse remains polarized: industry stakeholders emphasize glyphosate’s role in modern farming and claim safety within established exposure limits, while critics point to potential health risks and environmental concerns, pushing for bans or phased reductions. This tension shapes ongoing regulatory debates and potential changes to product formulations or labeling. [policy and industry analysis]
-
For local context in the United States, discussions around consumer-facing glyphosate products (like household herbicides) continue to appear in media and consumer safety discussions, with attention to labeling, usage guidelines, and the availability of alternative weed management options. [consumer protection reporting]
If you’d like, I can:
- Pull the very latest headline summaries from major outlets and regulators and provide direct citations.
- Create a brief one-page brief summarizing key safety findings, regulatory statuses by region, and potential regulatory timelines.
- Highlight any ongoing legal cases or major corporate announcements related to glyphosate-based herbicides.
Would you prefer a quick, cited briefing or a focused regional snapshot (e.g., U.S. vs Canada vs EU)?
Sources
The journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology retracted the paper last week, citing documents made public through litigation in the U.S. The retraction notice cited documents made public through litigation in the U.S. that suggest employees of Monsanto, which makes Roundup, may have helped write the article without proper acknowledgment — a practice known as ghostwriting. The retraction notice said the conclusions on whether glyphosate causes cancer were "solely based on unpublished...
www.cbc.caA comprehensive carcinogenicity study on the world’s most used herbicide, glyphosate, involving scientists from Europe and the U.S., has found that low doses of the controversial weed killer cause multiple types of cancer in rats.
publichealth.gmu.eduNew paper is "critical step forward in filling knowledge gaps of glyphosate carcinogenicity in humans". Report: Claire Robinson
www.gmwatch.orgBayer-Monsanto announced today that the company will no longer sell glyphosate-based herbicides to U.S. consumers as of 2023
foe.orgProblems with a 25-year-old landmark paper on the safety of Roundup's active ingredient, glyphosate, have led to calls for the E.P.A. to reassess the widely used chemical.
www.nytimes.comEffects found at doses considered safe by regulatory agencies
www.gmwatch.orgFriends of the Earth Australia (FoEA) believes that social and environmental issues cannot be separated from each other. As a result, FoEA is a social and environmental justice organisation. We seek to work toward a sustainable and equitable future, and to operate in a way that empowers individuals and communities. This means that all members of FoEA operates on a collective basis, and utilises the consensus decision-making model to work towards the aims and objectives of the federation, and...
www.foe.org.auCheck out this page via the Business and Human Rights Centre
www.business-humanrights.org