A U.S. appeals court ruled that the long-standing federal ban on home distilling is unconstitutional. In a decision reported on April 10, the Fifth Circuit (based in New Orleans) said the ban was an improper use of Congress’s taxing power and that it effectively reduced tax revenue by preventing distillation in the first place.[3]
What the court decided
- The appeals court upheld a challenge brought by the Hobby Distillers Association (and members of the group), concluding the nearly 158-year-old prohibition on home distilling cannot stand under the Constitution.[3]
- The opinion (written by Circuit Judge Edith Hollan Jones for a three-judge panel) also criticized the government’s reasoning as potentially allowing Congress to criminalize almost any in-home activity that might go beyond tax enforcement.[1][3]
Context & why it matters
- The ruling is a direct blow to enforcement of the federal “home distilling” prohibition, but it does not necessarily determine how states regulate distilling and alcohol production within their borders. (Separate state rules can still apply.)[7]
- The court’s reasoning focused on limits to federal power (especially the link to taxing), contrasting the ban with laws that regulate distilled spirits in ways the government can tax.[1][3]
If you want, tell me whether you care most about (a) what people can legally do now, (b) whether the decision is likely to be appealed, or (c) what states can still regulate—then I’ll tailor the update.
Sources
Federal judge in Texas ruled that an 1868 ban on at-home distilling exceeded Congress's taxing power and violated the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause.
www.foxnews.comHAMMER & NIGEL: A U.S. appeals court (5th Circuit) ruled that a 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling is in fact, unconstitutional.
wibc.comLate last night, after months of litigation, a federal court in Texas decided the federal ban on at-home distillation of beverage spirits is unconstitutional. The district court’s decision is fair; it is correct on the law; and it is historic. Lawyers at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) represent several amateur home-distilling enthusiasts who want to […]
cei.orgA U.S. appeals court declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to exercise its power to tax.
thedailyrecord.comFederal Judge rules 1868 law banning on home-distilling is unconstitutional. Grants plaintiffs' motion and dismisses case with prejudice.
www.distillerytrail.comTake control of your stock market success. Maximize your gains by unlocking our expert tools, stock picks and analysis. Our paid subscriptions lead you to stock market success. Choose from our…
hk.marketscreener.comThe U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently ruled that a federal prohibition on home distilling that has been in place for more than 150 years as...
federalism.orgA U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to exercise its power to tax. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.
ground.newsUS appeals court declares 158-year-old home distilling ban unconstitutional
www.investing.comUS News is a recognized leader in college, grad school, hospital, mutual fund, and car rankings. Track elected officials, research health conditions, and find news you can use in politics, business, health, and education.
www.usnews.com